September 20, 2007

Dems get some of their own medicine: Senate Speaks Out Against MoveOn.org ad

President Bush Plays Hardball against MoveOn.org

Well well well!  As a New Yorker I am just “appalled” that both of my Senators, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and the ever charming Chuck Schumer voted “Nay” to the Senate Amendment aimed at last week’s MoveOn.org ad in the NY Times against General Petreaus, read more here. Now how does it look for a presidential candidate, one who hopes to be the Commander and Chief of today’s military, to essentially approve of this type of action? The question now is, if she sees it acceptable for General Petreaus, does that, by proxy, make it acceptable for someone to take out an attack ad like that on her?

How about this?

Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton

 Will White House Interns be vetted differently under THIS Clinton Administration?

 Now, being the realistic individual that I am, I can assure you that the NY Times would not give me any kind of discount on this ad and I am willing to bet that they wouldn’t even publish the thing.  Why?  Because the NYT leans to the left.  And, Hillary obviously leans even farther to the left for fear of not supporting her potential voter base.  Yet, she was narrow in her thinking in that she may well have gained some more military minded voters who are on the fence. 

 If I have learned anything about the American voting public, and this is in the general sense as well, we tend to let one or possibly two issues decide how we will vote.  Our voting public is ignorant, in the true sense of the word, because it rarely takes the time to see beyond the superficial.  Case in point, those who want out of Iraq voted a resounding Democratic ticket this past November.  We went through a few months of Nancy Pelosi everyday, all day on all channels when she became the self-purported “most powerful women in the World”.  Yet, once her knights in shining armor, Reid and Murtha started stumbling over their own feet and getting a few dings in their armor, suddenly all we hear from Nancy is crickets chirping.  She has been as quite as a church mouse for months. 

The Dems and their moon-battery membership are only thinking short term, much like their forefathers of the Vietnam Era.  Just get us out and to Hell with the consequences!  This is the same strategy that they have today with no thought or consideration for the consequences.  … Well, look into the eyes of the mother, father, brother, sister, cousin, aunt or uncle of those left behind in Vietnam.  Tell them that exiting without proper accounting for their loved one was the right thing to do. 

Tomorrow is POW/MIA Recognition Day.  Please find a local ceremony and attend.  Look into the eyes of some of these families or possibly men who served with someone who never made it home.   There are 124 servicemen from the State of NY who were unaccounted for, still over 1700 overall remain but an asterisk to the war that everyone wanted to forget.

Unfortunately, considering the enemy that we are fighting in this war, the consequences, dare I say, are quite a bit steeper than even those 1700 + who still remain lost in the fog of war.

September 17, 2007

It’s no fun Being an Illegal Alien: Arellano, Mexico and “illegals”

“It’s no fun being an Illegal Alien”

“It’s no Fun Being an Illegal Alien”  … The 80’s band “Genesis” had it right 25 years ago!

In a recent article at mysanantonio.com, Robert Seltzer writes a very telling piece on the mindset of those Mexican citizens who are involved in the fight against our immigration laws. Selzter refers to the recently arrested and deported Mexican illegal alien, Elvira Arellano, as an “icon” and states, “The Lord is a terrible bodyguard”. One more time, “The Lord is a terrible bodyguard” – this is the same woman who until her arrest, had been hiding out in a Chicago church for almost a year. And this writer has the nerve to say that the Lord is a terrible bodyguard? Oh and by the way, Mr. Seltzer, this doesn’t sound blasphemous – it IS blasphemous!

Did the thought ever cross anyone’s mind that maybe the Lord didn’t support her cause? I don’t know about you but when I do stupid things I really don’t expect the Lord to be my bodyguard. I just sort of hope he might be briefly looking the other way at that moment. But this assumption that the Lord, God has forsaken her in some way borders on the absurd. Can someone start quoting me some bible verses that state that illegally entering another country, vehmently defying their laws and hiding out in a church or temple is somehow condoned by God? … Where IS my Concordance?

Seltzer goes on to say that Arellano finally, “tired of hiding”. Hmm, well no actually, according to the Chicago Tribune, she left the church in Chicago to attend an immigration rally in Los Angeles and then subsequently arrested. Here is another interesting fact that appears in the Tribune article, Arellano was ordered to leave the US in 1997 … worth repeating .. 1997! And her son is how old – 8 years-old? Do the math folks, she knowingly gave birth some two years after she was order to leave the country. Today, she uses that little boy as a shield for her definace of American Law. Well, I have news for her, no one told her she couldn’t take her son with her! Therefore, all of this tearful “Mother and child seperation” was of her own doing! Does she really want us to believe that the Mexican Government refused her son entry into the country? He is indeed eliglble for Mexican citizenship.This one is a real peach, “Unlike most undocumented immigrant illegal aliens, Arellano …lived in the cruel klieg lights of celebrity …” Umh, I have to wonder, if she was hiding out in the church, how was she supporting herself and her son? Or better yet, “who” was financially support this icon and her son? How “cruel” that others paid for her to hide from the law for almost a year. Where can I get a gig like this? … Silly me, I can’t I’m only a citizen of the United States!

She asked for a diplomatic visa? Don’t you have to be a diplomat to get one of those? Doesn’t the State Department have to approve that status? Do you think that the new presidente de Mexico only met with her because he saw it as a photo opt, or dare I say, a way to stick it to the US to let us know there is a new sheriff South of the Border? One who is working on strengthening ties with Cuba and Columbia, more on that  here.

And last but not least, my personal favorite from this little romantization of a criminal, “You never imagine that this is going to happen to you.” Oh! I get it, so you just paid the “coyote” to stuff you in the back of a trailer, then walk miles through the desert at night, get on a  plane or a train to Chicago with a fake ID, go to work with a fake ID …. Yeah, who would ever imagine that you would get caught!

September 14, 2007

Jan Scruggs – or should is be Shrugs?

vvmf1.gif

Press Release

OK USA Fans, here is the scoop.  Almost a week ago the word got out about what they are today calling an “oily substance” having been applied to the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, DC.  Now, I will tell you, among many people associated with the Vietnam Memorial, commonly known as “The Wall”, few are fans of Mr. Scruggs.  Family members of the 58,000 plus US servicemen whose names adorn The Wall are none impressed with Jan Scruggs, Founder and President of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, the non-profit organization that oversees The Wall.  

 Many Veterans and Family Members feel that Jan has made The Wall more about him than about the 58,000 names on it.  He regularly refers to it as “his” wall and commonly, when disccussing anything related to The Wall, prefers to use the first person singular rather than the first person plural.   In short, it is all about him.  Well, up until this past weekend it was all wine and roses and apparently “green twinkies”, aka cash.  (For more on “green twinkies” I highly recommend the film “Confidence” starring Edward Burns, 2003).

Well, now Jan has to show what that six figure salary of his is really worth.  Based on reports and the aforementioned press release, it would appear that Jan is choosing to shrug this all off in the hopes that with all the other high profile topics hitting the Beltway this week; General Petreaus’ testimony before Congress, The President’s Address to the Nation, Hurricane Humberto and dare I not mention the pending plight of OJ Simpson in Las Vegas, it will go unnoticed.

It would appear that Jan is attempting to fly this one under the radar hoping that we will all forget.  Well, Jan, I have news for you – I’m not forgetting and I know about … oh, 58,000 families that aren’t forgetting either.  For some of those families, this is the only real memorial their loved ones have.  Our nation has truly forgotten but there are indeed still some approximately 1,300 US Servicemen unaccounted for from the Vietnam War.  If Jan truly believes in protecting their memory and their memorial, he will get out from behind his desk and head up to the Hill to get some funding for security on The Wall. 

 Jan?  Are you listening?

*crickets churping*

September 13, 2007

Random Shots for September 13, 2007

Our Nation’s Capital

Random Shots… The political landscape is simply amuck with perplexing labyrinths, most stemming from the response to General Petraeus’ testimony before Congress, the military’s Iraq report card if you will.  The rippling effect of this is interesting to say the least.  The most obvious is the MoveOn.org ad referring to the General as a liar and a betrayer.  This is a perfect example of what my mom told me an education was all about; learning to be civil in the case of a disagreement and using your intelligence to argue your opposing view point.  As we all well know by now, the Left, and not just in this instance I might add, has taken to name calling, and much worse for no other reason that the “shock effect” of it all.  The MoveOn.org people are simply showing their true colors by going to such lengths as personal attacks on a man who, for all extensive purposes, is responsible for keeping their sorry bottoms safe from all enemies foreign and domestic.  It would appear that they are indeed the enemy within.   …………… Another interesting thought was presented over at FoxNews.com.  With the presidential election atmosphere so prevalent so early for the ’08 Elections, the most obvious question is, are the members of Congress placating to their voting block or making decisions that are right for America?  As a constituent of the Jr. Senator from NY, Hillary Clinton, her performance this week has reeked of placation.  No matter what General Petraeus could have said, it would not have been good enough for her or anyone on her side of the aisle.  She had her words prepared knowing that she would have a captive TV audience, no missed opportunities for the lady from Chappaqua, sound byte in hand.  If you get the opportunity, head on over to Yahoo.com.  They have an online debate with presidential candidates.  Be sure to check out the clip of Hillary responding to Bill Moyer’s question about being fooled by President Bush.  She said that the first thing she will do when she takes over the office of the President of the United States is to bring our troops home.  The only remaining question, dear Senator of mine, then what?  Wait for the War to come to US?  …………….. The rumor mill is busting with reports that some kind of substance has appeared on the Vietnam Memorial in the nation’s capital.  This disturbs me to no end as the individuals who would stoop so low as to desecrate a monument that represents the lives of over 58,000 American is simply beyond me.  These people have no message for the American people.  What message is this act sending?   This was simply an act of some desperate soul looking for attention.  I would challenge whoever did this to come face to face with a family member of one of those 58,000 + names and justify their actions.   I know more than a few family members of  names on this sacred wall.  The individual or individuals who did this are cowards in the purest form.  Jan Scruggs, the president of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, the organization that oversees the Wall has been oddly dodging the question as to whether or not this was vandalism or “an accident”.  An accident that covers about 20 panels?  PLEASE!!!

August 27, 2007

Day One – Who I am (Posted Jan. 30, 2007 @10:09 am)

Day One – Who I am

Well, Folks, it’s official. I am starting my blog. I have spent the past few years reading, listening and forming my opinions. But first, it is probably appropriate to tell you a little about my background.

I guess I was raised in the American Dream. My father was a child on a small Mediterranean island off the coast of Sicily when the Allied Forces invaded during WW II. Growing up I heard stories about his childhood, it seemed like an almost fictitious, fantasy world which I was finally fortunate enough to visit with him when I was in my early 20s. Meeting relatives I never knew and seeing where my roots were had an everlasting affect on me. Dad came to the US in 1958 and began a life here that would make any man proud. The thing that stood out among all of his stories and memories was the image of my grandfather. He was well known on the island as a very stubborn, hardheaded man. I have been told, and it was confirmed upon my visit there, that my grandfather was thrown in the town jail on no less than four occasions for making pro-American statements in public , something that Don Benito, I am sure, did not approve of. If it weren’t for my grandmother’s cousin who was a circuit court judge, Grandpa would most like have been executed.

Instead, once the war ended, my grandfather saw to it that each and every one of his children made their way (legally I might add) to the US. Then he, along with my grandmother, came to America and Grandpa’s dream was fulfilled; his family was in America and he would die here. In June of 1966 he did just that, buried just a few short miles from my childhood home and a place where I would go as a child and still today as an adult, to talk with both him and my grandmother ~ One of the greatest men I never knew.

Thankfully, my maternal grandfather was a significant part of my life and I was blessed with him for some 26 years. He too was of Italian decent, first generation as a matter of fact and just as patriotic as my paternal grandfather. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, Grandpa, like many Americans, left his wife and five children and joined the US Navy. He was a kind, warm, gentle man and would take any opportunity to laugh. He was extremely proud of two things, his family and his service in the Navy. The walls of the family bakery were filled with family photos and photos from Grandpa’s time in the Navy. One of my favorite stories is the one told by my mom and her siblings. In late 1945 after victory was declared, they all crowded around one of those floor model old-fashion radios listening as the naval ships gradually returned to dock in Norfolk. For days they sat there wondering if the boat was still afloat as news was not as instantaneous as it is today and the concept of military security actually existed back then. Still today, some 62 years later, not one of his children can tell the story without crying as they tell of the yelling and screaming and tears of joy that flowed the moment they heard that the USS Estes had been identified on the horizon and was steaming its way into port.

Just a few years ago, through the marvel of the Internet, I found a man who served with Grandpa and remembered him well. Aside from the wonderfully kind memories he had of my grandfather, he told us that he was on deck with my grandfather as they watched the Marines raise the flag on Mt. Suribachi. Something that I never knew. But I am sure that Grandpa stood their proudly and with tears in his eyes as that flag was raised, proud to be an American.

So, with that brief introduction, you can imagine which way the wind is blowing on this blog. Here is just a quick list of random thoughts that you can expect to see expounded on here.

The War on Terror

Immigration

Hillary Clinton

John McCain

John Kerry

The lack of real Americans in Congress

The issues with the Press trying to mold opinion instead of reporting the news

The sacrifice and pride of our fighting men and women in harm’s way

Why we should fear Nancy Pelosi

… and lots of other wicked stuff that will come out of Washington over the weeks and months ahead

So, sit back, get some Joe or your beverage of choice and blog with the Proud Infidel! My next entry will attempt to explain why I have named my blog as such.

Until then, remember ….
“Only two people have ever willingly given their lives for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier”.

August 27, 2007

Blonde Ambition (Posted January 31, 2007 @ 9:59 am)

August 27, 2007

Trouble in Caucusville (Posted February 1, 2007 @ 7:04 pm)

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Trouble in Caucusville

Sorry for posting so late today, there was a lot to talk about and read about on lots of news outlets and blogs. I spent most of the day reading up on the fallout from the Washington Post’s William Arkin blog claiming that the US military should be supporting America more vs. asking America to support them. It was as if I were reading the words, comprehending their meaning but I was reading a foreign language. I thought about blogging about that but decided that I would let my boys on the milblogs have their say on that, Lord knows they earned it. Uncle Jimbo at BlackFive.

Then, there is some “fun” brewing over at Michelle Malkin. It seems that NY Times reporter and a Getty Images photographer over in the Sandbox committed career suicide by reporting and airing on the NYT website footage of a dying US Soldier, Sgt. Hector Leija of Texas. Now, reporting on the death of the Texas hero wasn’t the faux pas, the fact that they aired it well before the family was notified and give the usual 24 hour reprieve is what has them in big dodo with the DoD.

This afternoon, I finally found something to 1) dig my linguistics teeth into and 2) that hasn’t already been addressed by some of the other major bloggers so far. There have been accusations on the part of Rep. Loretta Sanchez,D (CA-47) that the Hispanic Caucus Chairman Joe Baca, also of California called her “The P Word”. For those of you unfamiliar with Spanish, it translates to “The W Word” in English.

Now, being someone who has studied Spanish, lived in a Spanish speaking country and with Spanish speaking people for quite some time, it is quite possible, that ifBaca called her the Spanish translation of this word, the contextual definitions are almost limitless. Without going into too much detail or stepping on the toes of George Carlin, “the P Word” in Spanish is almost as multifunctional as “the F word” in our beloved English Language. The context of the usage is more defining than simply the word itself. The issue remains, did he mean “the W word” or “The B word” or several other possibilities. Regardless, she resigned from the Caucus and denial is the word of the day from the Baca Camp.

This flap lead me to look into origin of the caucuses, both Hispanic and Black and what I found was rather intriguing.

Black Caucus
Hispanic Caucus

The Hispanic Caucus’ Mission Statement is as follows:

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus aims to address national and international issues and the impact these policies have on the Hispanic community. The function of the Caucus is to serve as a forum for the Hispanic Members of Congress to coalesce around a collective legislative agenda. In addition to covering legislative action, the CHC also monitors Executive and Judicial issues.

CHC legislative priorities cover all areas that have a direct impact on the Hispanic community. In order to best address these diverse issues, members work in smaller task forces that draw on their expertise and develop priority legislation within each area.

The Black Caucus’ Mission Statement is as follows:

The Caucus describes its goals as “positively influencing the course of events pertinent to African-Americans and others of similar experience and situation,” and “achieving greater equity for persons of African descent in the design and content of domestic and international programs and services.”

The CBC encapsulates these goals in the following priorities: Closing the achievement and opportunity gaps in education, assuring quality health care for every American, focusing on employment and economic security, ensuring justice for all, retirement security for all Americans, and increasing equity in foreign policy

In a previous post I have stated that I take issue with those who base their vote solely on someone’s gender, race, color or even sexual orientation. Now, tread carefully, I said only,not that it isn’t or shouldn’t be a factor but it shouldn’t be the only factor. People who only vote red or only blue, they too are questionable voters. We all must be educated voters and at the very least, learn a little bit about each candidate before pulling the lever.

The question has arisen, do we still need caucuses? Do they really serve a constructive purpose in the 21st Century? Do they make a positive difference? Do they have any impact at all? Going a step further, what’s next? A Muslim Caucus? A Catholic Caucus? Why isn’t there an Italian Caucus? An Irish Caucus?

Now here is the surprise for me, both the Black and Hispanic Caucuses historically are almost exclusively Democrats. According to the link above, in the Black Caucus there have only been three Republican members since its inception in 1969. My question is this, since minority groups tend to be Democrats, this is no big surprise but the point that needs to made is, aren’t we just giving the Democrats another avenue to organize and influence?

Would we accept a Southern Caucus whose states are traditionally Republican? Hmmmmm ….

Here is more on this from Michelle Malkin
here

August 27, 2007

What Redeployment and Protests Really Mean: A Lesson from Vietnam (Posted February 2, 2007 @

Friday, February 2, 2007

What Redeployment and Protests Really Mean: A Lesson from Vietnam

Since Hanoi Jane is back in the limelight after her latest anti-war rally in DC, it’s worth looking back with a little 20/20 vision on Vietnam and what our pulling out did not just to Vietnam but to our nation as well.

There is a wealth of info out there on Vietnam that truly is amazing. Here are a few interesting ROE (Rules of Engagement) factoids for you.

1 – No matter the circumstances, do not shoot unless you are shot at first.
Translation: If you are out in the boonies with your platoon and see VC approaching across a rice patty. Keep those weapons down, Boys.
Yes, folks this was actually an ROE in parts of I Corps during the early phases of the war. Why? Because the enemy was not easily identified and civilian casualties were bad PR. Sound familiar?

2 – When an operation was going to be executed in a rural area that most likely had civilians in the vicinity, leaflets were dropped a day or two before to “warn” the locals that we would be coming. Hey! Nothing like letting the enemy know where to find you. No joke folks, I have actually seen copies of the leaflets. (Reminds me of that hilarious scene in “Heartbreak Ridge” when Gunny Highway blows a gasket because Major Powers has the ambush site pre-arranged for a training exercise)

I can tell you right now that these two ROEs did not come from the Pentagon but from those politicians in Washington who, for all extensive purposes left our fighting men with one hand politically tied behind their backs from the mid 60’s until the final pull out on 1975. Sound familiar?

The next step is to consider what the anti-war rallies did to the men in the field, those being held in POW camps and to the propaganda machine of the enemy. We are obviously seeing in recent days the beginning of what Vietnam Vets must have felt upon hearing Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden and others spouting what many believe equates to treason when we hear last Friday’s NBC Nightly News report from Iraq. In this report Staff Sergeant Manuel Sahagun was interviewed and stated, ”one thing I don’t like is when people back home say they support the troops, but they don’t support the war. If they’re going to support us, support us all the way.” Here the Staff Sergeant is expressing frustration, which will most likely escalate to other, stronger emotions as the MSM has their way with the minds of the American people. The point that many reporters just refuse to accept is that the men in the field are more knowledgeable about what is going on in Iraq than they are and they don’t like it. What a reporter may see in the act of witnessing a tactical operation in the field will not have the same translation as the men who planned and organized the mission and who have the military training to know why they do what they do. A reporter, no matter how good, will not have the trained military eye to truly understand what is transpiring before their eyes. There is no “War for Dummies” book out there. The MSM just can’t handle this simple fact that a 19 year-old kid from Missouri has a better grasp of a given situation than a seasoned journalist who has spent the last ten years honing his/her craft. They aren’t about to let some snot-nosed kid show them up.

This next section is not well know outside of certain circles, and for those who don’t know a lot about the POW situation in Vietnam, please, pay close attention. When the anti-war machine started gaining momentum in the US, the North Vietnamese were quick to take advantage of this unsolicited propaganda and use it against the thousand or so US POWs that were held both in the North and South. Many misrepresent the Vietnamese as a ragtag loosely structured fighting force. We must not forget that the Vietnamese had been fighting off aggressors for decades before we arrived, the most recent aggressor before the US arrived in the early 60’s were the French and it is no secret that the French were paying off the Vietnamese behind closed doors long after their war ended in exchange for prisoners the Vietnamese held back after the French officially pulled out their troops. In short, these guys weren’t stupid, they knew exactly what to do and how and people like Fonda were just feeding the beast. Sound familiar?

Many uninformed Americans consider the insurgency to be a group of ragtag loosely structured fighting units. Today’s insurgency is fueled by more than our Vietnamese enemy was 40 years ago. In Nam it was the political threat of Communism yet the insurgency, because of the intermingling of their politics and their religion, have more at stake than their form of government. For those held in the now infamous Hanoi Hilton, tape recordings of Jane Fonda and others were piped right into their cells via a PA system. During torture sessions they were reminded that their fellow Americans considered them criminals by quoting these treasonous statement. Additionally, what I consider the most damning of statements, they attempted to drive home the fact that no one at home cared about them and claimed “we can keep you forever”. Even today, these former POWs question the short sightedness of these anti-war protestors and even many within our government. I highly recommend the DVD Stolen Honor which focuses on a series of present day interviews with former POWs from Vietnam who detail exactly what the anti-war movement meant to them when they were behind bars. Just imagine for a moment, knowing the kinds of excruciating torture that you were being subjected to both physical and mental only to have Fonda, Hayden and others come visit you in prison and reaffirm how thankful you must be for the kind treatment of your captors.

Now here is where Vietnam and Iraq diverge, once our troops were pulled out of Vietnam, we simply packed our bags and went home, left with the perception of having lost the first military conflict of our nation’s history. As false and untrue as that idea of defeat was, and as horrible as the reception our troops received upon their return home, at least it was definitely over for the US. The Vietnamese took their spoils of war and went home.

This is NOT the case with Iraq. Yes, if we pull out before the job is done as we did in Vietnam, there will be civilian atrocities that may well mirror Nam and many Vets of this latest conflict will have to deal with the difficult reality of the anhialation of their former counterparts who whom they fought the good fight. But Iraq will not end there. Many Americans have turned into perpetual ostriches refusing to accept the fact that the insurgency is about much more than who is in control in Iraq. The enemy will not stand up dust themselves off, pat each other on the back and go back home. They have been programmed to believe that their purpose in life is to destroy our way of life, our belief system and to either convert us to Islam or kill us for our defiance. They have openly stated this over and over.

This hasn’t been called the War on Terror for nothing, Folks. They will bring the war to a city near you in short order. And don’t think for a minute that pulling out of Iraq will not fuel their thirst even more giving them the perception, just as in Nam, that they were able to defeat the most powerful military force on the planet not by over powering them but by simply knowing the enemy and that we are a nation of instantaneous gratification. We are a spoiled people, always used to getting what we want at the drop of a hat. I think back to what my grandparents were asked to sacrifice during WWII in the name of the war effort, what has been asked of the American people today? “Support the Troops, all the way”, so little to ask compared to past generations yet the real question is, “What is the alternative?”

I don’t know about you but I like being able to pray to whom I want, when I want and that my daughters can be whoever they want to be.

How about you?

August 27, 2007

HPV, STD and Texas Governor Rick Perry (Posted February 3, 2007 @ 10:09 am)

Saturday, February 3, 2007

HPV, STD and Texas Governor Rick Perry

The Associated Press reported late yesterday that Texas Gov. Rick Perry has circumvented Conservative lawmakers and parents by issuing an executive order making it mandatory that school age females receive the vaccination Gardasil against the human papillomavirus (HPV) beginning in 2008.(article)

On the surface this may all seem well and good, we have all seen the ads touting that HPV is a virus that could lead to cervical cancer. Yet, there was no mention of the fact that HPV was a sexually transmitted disease (STD). A hat tap to the marketing team at Merck Pharmaceutical for leaving out that little tidbit of info. But the big question is, why did Gov. Perry step up to make this landmark order? He has direct connections to both Merck and others who are pushing the issue, AP says,

“Perry has ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company’s three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry’s former chief of staff. His current chief of staff’s mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.”

Pretty blatant for Perry to have such visible ties to the major players in this issue and still make the order in the name of what is best for the children. Oops, not the children, “the girls”. When confronted on the issue Perry claims that this is no different than requiring a polio vaccination. Huh?

Q and A Time! If the vaccine is only required for females then it isn’t just like polio. If the transmission of HPV is through sex activity then it isn’t just like polio. If a female abstains from sex then she is “immune” to HPV, that isn’t just like polio.

It would appear that the aforementioned women’s groups have been caught up in quite a web of misinformation and I really have difficulty accepting the fact that this is considered a women’s issue. Obviously many female conservative parents are going to be concerned that this is a “get out of jail free card” from the State to have sex. There will be the confusion as to whether or not this is also a form of birth control, no matter how much sex ed is throw at today’s school. As well as the fact that not women, but girls as young as 9 will be required to receive this vaccination. But it appears to this writer that the role of men in the spread of HPV is somehow completely void in this discussion. What about their promiscuity? Where is there vaccine? Are they not a carrier of this virus?

As a parent, these would be my questions to the Gov. Perry:

1) Governor, why make this vaccine available for girls as young as 9?

2) Governor, why require it at all and not just make it an option with parental consent?

3)Governor, why is TX the first state to be embroiled in this debate? Is this about TX or your connections to those lobbying for the Pharmaceutical company?

4) Governor, what are the statistic for HPV and cervical cancer in TX? Are they more prevalent in TX? If so, why?

5) Governor, it would appear by your “just like polio” comment that you aren’t well informed on the transmission of this virus. Would you care to expound?

6) Governor, obviously this vaccine has FDA approval, but are there any long-term independent studies that have been done that show any positive or negative effects on the females that received the vaccine? If not, don’t you think you are taking a huge liability risk by making it mandatory vs. optional? Do you feel that the Great State of Texas is financially prepared for the litany of law suits that could abound if some long term effects do surface in say 10 or 20 years?

I really have to wonder what Merck is offering that would make such a gamble with the lives of millions of women acceptable.

**** UPDATE 2/4/07 from Fox News – More Trouble for Perry ****
Click here for more

August 27, 2007

WaPo’s Karen De Young and Her Left Jab at the Surge (Posted February 4, 2007 @ 1:29 pm)

Sunday, February 4, 2007

WaPo’s Karen De Young and Her Left Jab at Surge

In today’s Sunday Edition of the Washington Post, Karen De Young takes another “left jab” at the Administration’s enhancement to the Iraq policy, known affectionately or otherwise as “Surge”.

“The success of the Bush administration’s new Iraq strategy depends on a series of rapid and dramatic political and economic reforms that even the plan’s authors have little confidence will work.”

Is De Young seriously trying to convince the WaPo’s readership that Bush’s Senior Staff and some of the best military minds at the Pentagon got together under growing pressure from the Left and put together a lukewarm plan at best? Knowing all that was at stake, they just threw a plan at the wall and used what stuck? Knowing full well that political hats are being thrown into the proverbial ring all around the Beltway for ‘08 with Iraq as the focal point; that there would be no “do-overs” and that this plan would be critical for this administration’s legacy and the success of Iraq, De Young stood by this story? With the overwhelming ramifications of this plan, delusional is the only word that comes to mind.

Now, a little more on the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that De Young references here from the Council on Foreign Relations. Before getting into the details of the NIE, it is important to note that the NIE defines itself as an entity that does not predict but estimates the possible course of future events. Huh? Even in the introduction of the report released Friday the NIE summarizes their ratonale as imperfect at best;

These assessments, which are based on incomplete or at times fragmentary information are not a fact, proof, or knowledge. Some analytical judgments are based directly on collected information; others rest on previous judgments, which serve as building blocks. In either type of judgment, we do not have “evidence” that shows something to be a fact or that definitively links two items or issues.

The NIE link above also goes on to describe it’s process which usually takes two to three months for them to evaluate and report back on an item that they are asked to “estimate”. It would appear that they fast-tracked their review of the President’s plan just a bit.

As if the waters couldn’t get muddier, on Friday, when the classified report was released by the NIE, De Young and Walter Pincus had an WaPo A1 page piece in which they stated;

At a Pentagon news conference, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, noting that he had not read the report, said he agreed with Hadley that “the words ‘civil war’ oversimplify a very complex situation.”

Yet, here is what the unclassifed version of the report has to say in direct contradiction to the De Young-Pincus piece. This is what it said in the context of the “civil war” claim;

The Intelligence Community judges that the term “civil war” does not adequately capture the complexity of the conflict in Iraq, which includes extensive Shia-on-Shia violence, al-Qa’ida and Sunni insurgent attacks on Coalition forces, and widespread criminally motivated violence. Nonetheless, the term “civil war” accurately describes key elements of the Iraqi conflict, including the hardening of ethno-sectarian identities, a sea change in the character of the violence, ethno-sectarian mobilization, and population displacements.

Now if you re-read the Sunday piece carefully, the above quote is somewhat contradictory or at the very least, an exaggeration compared to Friday’s summary of the same classified report. It was not specified if the declassified report or classified report was used in the filing of either report. DeYoung and Pincus’ source in Friday’s piece is described as simply “a source familiar with the document”. I don’t know about you but I would have given much more credence to “a source close to the President” or “a source within the Pentagon” or something to that effect. “A source familiar with the document”, could be the intern who drove the 90 page document from the Pentagon to the White House. So much for “classified” it appears.

Back to De Young’s Sunday piece, she briefly critiques the President’s public denial of the use of a “containment option” (pushing US troops back to the Iraqi borders to avoid sectarian violence). Although the Friday piece refers to Arizona Senator John McCain’s sleep-rendering soliloquy about the failed policy in Iraq during Gen. George Casey’s confirmation hearing as Army Chief of Staff, I guess De Young missed Casey’s most significant statement in which he confirmed that 14 of the 18 provinces in Iraq have reported little or no violence over the past two months. Casey went on to say that there are already six provinces, three in the north and three in the south that are completely under control of Iraqi Forces and three more that will be doing so over the next few weeks. What is our measure for success again? I don’t think I got the memo.

The irony of her closing for this piece actually caused a smile to creep over my face (sarcastic smile, but a smiles nonetheless).

But some officials worry that the expanded U.S. presence will repeat the mistakes of the past — when the United States oversaw virtually every part of the Iraqi government — and undermine the goal of turning the country over to the Iraqis themselves.

“It’s the same old problem as in 2003,” cautioned one official. “The same impatience that if they can’t do it we’ll step in and do it. There is a bit of that creeping into this dialogue.”

“Impatience”? If there are signs of impatience within Iraq it is from pressure from the Left and the anti-war people who simply want us out of Iraq at any cost so they can turn around and tell the Bush Administration they failed.